hudgell home page
               

 

 

 

Saturday October 5th 1935

BARNET FAIR MOTOR ACCIDENT

LORRY DRIVER SENT FOR TRIAL

 

  John Brook, lorry driver, of Southwark Park Road, Bermondsey, S.E. again appeared at the Barnet (Herts.) Police Court yesterday, on a charge of the manslaughter of the four persons who were killed when his motor lorry ran on to the pavement at Barnet Hill on the night of Saturday, September 7.


  The four persons killed were:- Police Constable James Warrender Thomson, of Mays Lane, Barnet; Mr. William Hudgell, and his wife, Mrs Minnie Hudgell, of Campsbourne Road, Hornsey; and Jean, their daughter, aged 10. At the inquest on September 12, the coroner committed Brook for trial at Hertfordshire Assizes.


   The jury at the inquest expressed application of the gallant action of Police constable Thomason in sacrificing his life in the execution of his duty. He tried to keep back the crowd when he saw the lorry approaching.


   Mr. Gwatkin, for the Director of Public Prosecutions, said that Brook was staying at a cafe in South Mimms, his family being away. On the evening of September 7 he decided to go from South Mimms to his home at Bermondsey to obtain some fresh clothes. As he was about to leave three men asked him for a lift, and he agreed to take them in his six-wheeled lorry. Two of the men sat beside Brook and the third on the knees of one of the other men. That was contrary to regulations, but it did not obscure the drivers view of the road.

 

  At Barnet Hill his speed was 20 to 25 miles an hour, although the regulation speed was 20 miles an hour. Opposite the police station he applied his brakes to go down the hill but found that they did not act. He saw in front a tramcar and behind it two lines of stationary vehicles. Thomson was directing the traffic. Brooks had stated that he realized that his vehicle was out of control, and he endeavoured to pass the tramcar on the offside.


   In doing so he mounted the kerb, knocked down Thomson, Mr and Mrs Hudgell and their daughter, and injured two or three other people.


Condition of Brakes


   Mr Gwatkin said that on the day following the accident Brook stated that his brakes would not act and he had to pull round the tramcar .He felt a bump and saw the policeman, but did not realize he had hit anyone. His lorry was in third gear. There was no suggestion that Brook was under the influence of drink. Examination of the brakes showed those on the off side to be in order.


  On the nearside the brake block of the front wheel was stripped and the driving wheel smothered in oil and mud. As there had been no rain that day that condition must have existed for some time.


  If you come to the conclusion,' added Mr Gwatkin, 'That this man ought to have known the condition of his brakes, I think you will be justified in sending Brook for trail for manslaughter. If you think he had no reasonable means of knowing their condition then you will not commit him.


  He has been committed already on the coroners warrant, but that, I submit has nothing to do with these proceedings'.


Evidence was then called


   Frederick Charles Stanton, lorry drivers mate, of Bow, said that he and two friends got a lift with Brook to go to Barnet Fair. As they were going down Barnet Hill Brook yelled out that his brakes had gone. The lorry increased its speed, and Brook pulled to the offside of stationary traffic.


   I saw a constable on the kerb with his back to us,' said Stanton. ' I realized that there must be an accident and I shut my eyes. I felt a lot of jolts and heard screaming, but what happened I could not say. I was so unnerved that when the lorry stopped I got out and ran away.'


   Mr H. Payton (defending) - If the brakes had been working properly he could have pulled up easily at the speed he was going?


   Stanton - Yes. Police Constable Yeo said that the lorry occupied about three or four feet of the pavement as it swept by the tramcar. He saw seven or eight people lying in the road after it passed.


   The case for the prosecution was concluded, and Mr Payton, for the defence, submitted that the evidence did not warrant committing Brook for trial for manslaughter. If they thought Brooks explanation true that his brakes unexpectedly failed to act, they ought not to commit him.


   Did he know that the brakes were out of order?


   He had previous had a long trip through Sussex and, according to the boys who accompanied him, there was no trouble with the brakes.


   After a brief retirement, Mr W Stutters (chairman) announced that the Bench had come to the conclusion that it was a case for a jury and they committed Brook for trail at Hertford Assizes on the charge of manslaughter.


   Brook, who pleaded 'Not Guilty' and reserved his defence, was allowed bail as before. The Bench granted him a certificate for legal aid.

 

 

Follow-up reports:

 

 

 

 


 

Pamela Bishop ©2002 - 2006  All rights reserved

 

last updated 16/11/2010 19:36

 

 

 

HUDGELL

FAMILY TREE

 


HOME


INTRODUCTION


OUR ANCESTORS


HUDGILL


 
HUDGELL
 

SPOUSES


SITEMAP


BIOGRAPHIES


LINKS


CONTACT ME


 

'Congratulations on a wonderful family history presentation.

I just "googled" on the off chance, and struck gold!....................

Jean Potter

 

TS